Thanks for reading, and it is actually a damn good question, and a damn good point.

And I want to give you 30,000 admittedly worthless points for using the phrase, "Henny Pennying"!

I think the difference is that these are New York state prosecutors with a small army of hungry prosecutors who are foaming at the mouth at the potential that a successful prosecution will do for their careers. Because at the end of the day, all lawyers are at their heart, politicians. And at the end of the day, this is a career maker for a case.

Merrick Garland has no real say in any of this, nor does any part of the Federal government, unless it wants to, and I don't get the sense that it wants to.

This is a state matter. And it's New York State, not, for example, Georgia, which also has an action item, a much more important one, I'd argue, regarding election interference, that I expect to never see light of day.

Thanks for reading and thanks for the great comment.